Case 4100185/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Johnstone v Represented by: Ms R Dyer -15 Strathclyde University Law Clinic M Recovery Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100185/2019
- Decision date
- 5 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Johnstone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Gall recorded that Miss K Johnstone's sex discrimination claim and her equal pay claim against M8 Recovery Limited had been withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment states that both claims were dismissed in terms of Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Rules of Constitution & Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No merits findings or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted judgment text. The decision is limited to disposal of the withdrawn claims, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the sex discrimination claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed in terms of Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Rules of Constitution & Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the equal pay claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed in terms of Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Rules of Constitution & Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.