Case 4100186/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100186/2019 Mr S McSorley v Healthcare Environmental Services Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100186/2019
- Decision date
- 21 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge France Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100186/2019 Mr S McSorley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. An Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, and failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £3,626.50, £650.30, and £1,610.12 respectively.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days from 27 December 2018, but the extracted judgment does not state a calculated amount for that award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £3,626.50. | Upheld | — | £3,627 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £650.30 for one week. | Upheld | — | £650 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,610.12. | Upheld | — | £1,610 |
| Other | Protective award claim: the judgment states the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and must pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days from 27 December 2018. No monetary figure is specified in the text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.