Case 4100188/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Anne Imfura v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100188/2022
- Decision date
- 25 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Anne Imfura
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Glasgow on 21 April 2022 before Employment Judge R McPherson. The claimant, Ms Anne Imfura, had presented her claim on 12 January 2022 but did not attend the hearing, despite having been advised that she should be present. The respondent, JDDN Enterprise Ltd, was also not present and not represented.
The written reasons do not set out separate findings on the substantive employment issues. The tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, considered the information available to it, and noted that the clerk had made practicable enquiries within the tribunal building because the claimant had been advised to attend.
Having considered those matters, the tribunal was satisfied that it was reasonable to dismiss the claim in all the circumstances. The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written reasons do not identify separate heads of claim. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims in full under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.