Case 4100192/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100192/2017 Mr S Earley v Respondent — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100192/2017
- Decision date
- 28 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joseph
Parties
1 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100192/2017 Mr S Earley
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Earley brought complaints of unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and age discrimination against Scottish SPCA. The judgment records that those complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the complaints under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings on the merits of the claims are recorded in the judgment text, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was recorded as withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint was recorded as withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint was recorded as withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.