Case 4100193/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Stevenson v Jo's Go Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100193/2025
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Stevenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 22 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge S MacLean found that Miss M Stevenson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded gross damages of £2,583.90, calculated by reference to 11 weeks at £234.90 gross weekly pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The gross redundancy payment was assessed at £5,989.95, calculated as 25.5 weeks at £234.90 gross weekly pay.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £352.35, calculated as 7.5 days at £46.98 gross daily pay. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was therefore £8,926.20.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded gross damages of £2,583.90, calculated as 11 weeks x £234.90 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £2,584 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £5,989.95, calculated as 25.5 weeks x £234.90 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £5,990 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £352.35, calculated as 7.5 days x £46.98 gross daily pay. | Upheld | — | £352 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,926
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.