Case 4100199/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Gardner v Arcus FM Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100199/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Gardner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat in Glasgow before Employment Judge S Cowen, with Mr J Gardner appearing in person and Arcus FM Limited represented by Mr P Chadwick, solicitor. No lay panel members are listed in the written judgment.
The written judgment records that, for reasons given orally at the hearing on 19 November 2019, the Claimant's application to the Employment Tribunal was dismissed. The supplied listing category identifies the case as unfair dismissal, but the written judgment itself does not set out the factual background, the legal reasoning, or any named statutory test.
No remedy was awarded or quantified in the written judgment, and no separate remedy components are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states only that the Claimant's application was dismissed for reasons given orally at the hearing; the unfair dismissal classification is taken from the supplied listing category and claim-type hint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.