Case 4100200/2013 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 103566/2011 & Others (see attached lists) Ms J Gordon & others v Represented by: Thompsons Inverclyde Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100200/2013
- Decision date
- 17 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 103566/2011 & Others (see attached lists) Ms J Gordon & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns a multiple schedule headed Inverclyde EQP, including case 4100200/2013, Mrs Pamela Steven v Inverclyde Council. The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
Employment Judge Frances Eccles dismissed the withdrawn claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of the equal pay claims and records no compensation, interest, or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. The listing and schedules identify the multiple as an equal pay matter, but no merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.