Case 4100203/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4100203/2017 Mr D Cochran v Represented by: Ms K Osborne - Solicitor Wood Group PSN Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100203/2017
- Decision date
- 31 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4100203/2017 Mr D Cochran
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only substantive finding recorded in the judgment is procedural: the claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge James Hendry dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not set out any merits findings on the underlying dispute, any liability analysis, or any award of compensation. It also does not identify any separate remedy components, and no financial award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The specific claim heads are not stated in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.