Case 4100213/2019 · Employment Tribunal
/ m EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4100213/2019 Miss K Robertson v Sukhan Zeeshan T/A Spar Biggar — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100213/2019
- Decision date
- 14 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
/ m EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4100213/2019 Miss K Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the Employment Judge issued a judgment on the available material under rule 21. The claim was brought by Miss K Robertson following termination of employment, seeking sums said to be due on that termination. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was not resisting the claim.
For Miss Robertson, the tribunal found she had 8 full years' service. It recorded her pay as £246.90 per week gross, £253.96 per week net, and employer pension contributions of £2.84 per week. It also recorded that she was due 0.5 weeks' pay in respect of outstanding holiday entitlement.
The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £1,851.75, damages of £2,054.42 for breach of contract arising from failure to pay statutory notice pay, and £126.98 in respect of annual leave accrued but untaken as at the date of termination. The total of the awarded sums was £4,033.15. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other substantive liability issue was determined in the reasons provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded as a redundancy payment by default judgment under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,852 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for failure to pay statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,054 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for annual leave accrued but untaken as at termination of employment, described as 0.5 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £127 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,033
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.