Case 4100214/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100214/2019 Miss G Curtis v Sukhan Zeeshan T/A Spar Biggar — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100214/2019
- Decision date
- 14 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100214/2019 Miss G Curtis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 because the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. It proceeded on the available material and accepted the claimant's representative's written information for Miss G Curtis, including that she had 11 full years' service.
On that basis, the tribunal awarded Miss Curtis a redundancy payment of £3,253.60. It also awarded £2,458.25 as damages for breach of contract, described as failure to pay statutory notice pay.
A further award of £552.88 was made in respect of annual leave accrued but untaken at the date of termination of employment. The total sum awarded to Miss Curtis was £6,264.73.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded as a redundancy payment on the material provided and the claimant's representative's figures. | Upheld | — | £3,254 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for failure to pay statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,458 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for annual leave accrued but untaken at the date of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £553 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,265
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.