Case 4100219/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100219/2017 Hearing in Portree Sheriff Courthouse on 13, and November 2017 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) James Cameron v Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100219/2017
- Decision date
- 13 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100219/2017 Hearing in Portree Sheriff Courthouse on 13, and November 2017 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) James Cameron
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant alleged that he had been constructively unfairly dismissed. The tribunal accepted that he had raised concerns in late 2014 about bullying, difficulty with equipment and tools, and his relationship with his manager at Kyle, and that those concerns were taken forward as a formal grievance. The grievance was investigated by an independent manager, witnesses were interviewed, and the claimant was offered mediation when the grievance outcome did not uphold his complaint about bullying.
The tribunal found that the claimant returned to work under Mr Murray after mediation and continued to work there for more than a year without further complaint about him. When he later resigned in July 2016, the tribunal held that the best evidence of his reason was his resignation email, which referred to his view that he could not return to Kyle because of the impact on his health. The tribunal found that this did not identify any breach of contract by the respondent and instead showed dissatisfaction with the position he was in, including the earlier grievance outcome.
Applying the constructive dismissal authorities, including section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Western Excavating v Sharp, the tribunal concluded that the respondent had not acted in a manner calculated or likely to destroy trust and confidence. It held that the grievance had been handled seriously, that the mediation process was reasonable, and that the respondent had also acted constructively in managing the claimant’s absences. The tribunal therefore found that there was no repudiatory breach, and the claim failed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claim was for constructive unfair dismissal and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- Brown v Merchant Ferries Ltd
- Malik v Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA
- BCCI v Ali (No 3)
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.