Case 4100221/2018 · Employment Tribunal
R Gall Ms A Chapman v Represented by:- Mr W McPartland –15 Solicitor RT Management Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100221/2018
- Decision date
- 11 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
R Gall Ms A Chapman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that liability had already been decided by judgment dated 15 March 2018 and sent to the parties on 26 March 2018. That earlier judgment found the claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unauthorised deduction from wages successful, and the April 2018 hearing was only to assess remedy.
At the remedy hearing, Ms Chapman gave evidence about her loss and mitigation. The tribunal accepted that she had made diligent efforts to find alternative employment after her dismissal on 24 October 2017. She obtained a new job quickly, but there was a period between early November 2017 and 4 January 2018 while references and criminal record checks were completed. She then continued to look for more hours and told her new employer she was available for additional work.
On loss, the tribunal found that Ms Chapman would have earned £2,880 from the respondents during the relevant period, and that she had received £934.12 from her new employer, leaving past loss of £1,945.88. The tribunal accepted that she continued to suffer ongoing loss because she was still working only 10 hours per week at the minimum wage instead of the 16 hours per week she had worked for the respondents. It considered a claim for 52 weeks too long and instead awarded ongoing loss for 40 weeks at £41.70 per week, giving £1,668. The resulting monetary award for unfair dismissal was £3,613.88, subject to recoupment because Universal Credit had been received.
In addition, the tribunal found two unlawful deductions from wages: £122.48 and £52.50. It ordered payment of the total, £174.98, under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability had already been found in the March 2018 liability judgment. The remedy hearing awarded a monetary award of £3,613.88, made up of past loss (£1,945.88 prescribed element) and ongoing loss for 40 weeks (£1,668). Subject to recoupment. | Upheld | — | £3,614 |
| Breach of contract | The March 2018 liability judgment had already found this claim successful. No separate monetary figure for breach of contract was set out in the remedy judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for two unauthorised deductions of £122.48 and £52.50. | Upheld | — | £175 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,789
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,614
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.