Case 4100224/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v ZLX Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100224/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 16 March 2022, the tribunal directed the claimant to provide additional information about her discrimination claims to both the respondent and the tribunal by 30 March 2022. The claimant was also asked to confirm by 23 March 2022 whether her unfair dismissal and redundancy claims were to be withdrawn. She did not comply with either direction.
The tribunal sent reminders on 28 March 2022 and 1 April 2022 asking for a response and again reminding the claimant to provide the required information on the discrimination claims. No reply was received.
On 12 April 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 26 April 2022, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant did not respond or give an acceptable reason, and the tribunal struck out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records no award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not actively pursued; the judgment refers to the claimant's discrimination claims in the plural but does not identify further protected characteristics in the extracted text. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was asked to confirm whether this claim was to be withdrawn and did not respond; the claim was then struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant was asked to confirm whether this claim was to be withdrawn and did not respond; the claim was then struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.