Case 4100229/2012 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100229/2012 Miss A Budge v Represented by: Highland Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100229/2012
- Decision date
- 26 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100229/2012 Miss A Budge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record is a short disposal judgment. It records that Miss A Budge’s claim against Highland Council was withdrawn by the claimant. The Employment Tribunal then dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on the merits are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is dated 26 March 2019 and was entered and sent to the parties on the same date. The presiding Employment Judge was Ian McFatridge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The extracted judgment does not describe the underlying substantive claim, but the case listing context identifies it as an Equal Pay Act matter. The judgment states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.