Case 4100230/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100230/2022 (V) Held at Aberdeen on 5, & December 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Members D McDougall A Atkinson Mr K Amevor v VKS Retail Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100230/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
- Panel members
- D McDougall, A Atkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100230/2022 (V) Held at Aberdeen on 5, & December 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Members D McDougall A Atkinson Mr K Amevor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sitting at Aberdeen on 5, 6 and 7 December 2022, with Employment Judge N M Hosie and members D McDougall and A Atkinson, gave unanimous oral reasons at the hearing and issued judgment on 8 December 2022. The claimant, Mr K Amevor, appeared in person and the respondent, VKS Retail Ltd, was represented by Dr O F Fakunie of Peninsula.
The extracted judgment text records only the final result: the claim was dismissed. No further findings of fact, legal analysis, or remedy award are set out in the text provided, so the basis for dismissal cannot be reconstructed from the extracted page alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text only states that 'the claim is dismissed' and does not specify the pleaded heads in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.