Case 4100236/2022 · Employment Tribunal

E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100236/20225 Held at Aberdeen on February 2023 Employment Judge: J M Hendry Members: Mr P Hammond Mrs D Massie Mr D Aziz v No Appearance Scott Nugent st and 1 other — 2023

Case reference: 4100236/2022
Decision date: 3 February 2023
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Venue: Aberdeen
Panel members: Mr P Hammond, Mrs D Massie, Mr D Aziz

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100236/20225 Held at Aberdeen on February 2023 Employment Judge: J M Hendry Members: Mr P Hammond Mrs D Massie Mr D Aziz

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal sat at Aberdeen on 1 February 2023 before Employment Judge J M Hendry with members Mr P Hammond, Mrs D Massie and Mr D Aziz. The claimant and both respondents did not attend and were not represented. The tribunal recorded that it had made enquiries, including emailing and telephoning the parties, before dealing with the case.

Because no party attended or was represented, the tribunal dismissed the claim in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying allegations.

The public listing identifies the case as involving race discrimination and religion or belief discrimination, so those are the claims reflected in the extraction. The judgment itself records only the procedural dismissal and does not apportion any remedy or make any compensation award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	Dismissed in accordance with Rule 47 after neither the claimant nor the respondents attended or were represented at the hearing; no merits findings were made.	Dismissed	Race	—
Religion or belief discrimination	Dismissed in accordance with Rule 47 after neither the claimant nor the respondents attended or were represented at the hearing; no merits findings were made.	Dismissed	Religion or belief	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.