Case 4100243/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sky Subscribers Services Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100243/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent, Sky Subscribers Services Limited, was represented by a solicitor. The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
The sex discrimination claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. Oral reasons were given at the hearing under rule 62(2) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and no written reasons were requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given, with no written reasons requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 62(2) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.