Case 4100276/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Lang & others (per attached schedule) v The Exchange Bar (EK) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100276/2025
- Decision date
- 26 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Lang & others (per attached schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claims brought by Mrs B Lang and the other claimants in the attached schedule against The Exchange Bar (EK) Limited because they had not been actively pursued. The respondent company had been dissolved, and the claimants had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
On 8 May 2026, the tribunal gave the claimants until 22 May 2026 to provide written reasons why their claims should not be struck out. They failed to give an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment was sent to the parties on 26 June 2026 and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out all claims but does not identify their substantive claim types. The listing categories of breach of contract and redundancy cannot be verified from the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.