Case 4100285/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Spanish Foods Ltd: S/4100285/2018 — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100285/2018
- Decision date
- 13 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Carlos Eduardo Pascual Pereyra's claim against Spanish Foods Ltd was listed for hearing in Glasgow on 11 April 2018 before Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. Mr S Gilmour, described as a former director of the respondent, appeared for the respondent. The tribunal noted that a Spanish interpreter had been booked and was in attendance, but the clerk had been unable to contact the claimant.
The reasons record that Mr Gilmour told the tribunal the claimant had not responded to the case management order and that the company had ceased trading. Having regard to the claimant's non-attendance and those points, the tribunal decided to dismiss the claim. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal complaint are recorded, and no monetary award is set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claim after the claimant did not attend the hearing. The reasons record that the claimant was not present or represented, the clerk could not make contact with him, and the tribunal took account of Mr Gilmour's note that the claimant had not responded to the case management order and that the respondent had ceased trading. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.