Case 4100287/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100287/2023 Mr P Heggie v Belford Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100287/2023
- Decision date
- 3 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100287/2023 Mr P Heggie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge L Wiseman decided the claim without a hearing, and the listed hearing on 29 March 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal upheld two elements of the claim. First, it found that Belford Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P Heggie’s wages and ordered payment of £685.25 for wages due for the period ending 30 October 2022. Second, it found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £116.95.
The holiday payment was quantified in the judgment as 10.17 hours at £11.50 per hour. The judgment does not record any other findings, legal tests, or additional remedy beyond those two awards, and the total sum payable from the judgment is £802.20.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £685.25 for the period ending 30 October 2022. | Upheld | — | £685 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s accrued holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £116.95, calculated as 10.17 hours at £11.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £117 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £802
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.