Case 4100293/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100293/2022 Mr J Greening v Glasgow City Council Cordia (Services) LLP Culture and Sport Glasgow — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100293/2022
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100293/2022 Mr J Greening
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr J Greening's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The basis for strike out was rule 37(1)(d), namely that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that on 2 September 2022 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 16 September 2022 explaining why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The claimant did neither.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason why a strike out order should not be made, and also failed to request a hearing. It therefore struck out the claim on 22 September 2022. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.