Case 4100298/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100298/2020 Miss C Bourreau v Caramel Holdings Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100298/2020
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100298/2020 Miss C Bourreau
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Caramel Holdings Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss C Bourreau’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £127.50 for unpaid wages for the week starting 11 November 2019.
The judgment also records that a hearing listed for 1 April 2020 would determine remedy for the unpaid holiday pay complaint, and that an order for further information had been issued separately to the claimant. That part of the case was not finally determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages for the week starting 11 November 2019. | Upheld | — | £128 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £128
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £128
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.