Case 4100299/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4100299/2025 Mr N Brodie v Bespoke Joinery Edinburgh — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100299/2025
- Decision date
- 16 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4100299/2025 Mr N Brodie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Sangster issued a judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,534.65. It further directed that the respondent may deduct any Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions required by law before payment, provided it remits those sums to HMRC and gives the claimant written evidence of the deductions and remittance; payment of the balance would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under rule 22 because no response was presented. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,534.65, subject to the usual deductions for tax and employee National Insurance if required by law. | Upheld | — | £2,535 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,535
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.