Case 4100300/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ross McGhee v Simon Driscoll Consultancy Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100300/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ross McGhee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a final hearing for unpaid wages. He confirmed that Simon Driscoll Consultancy Limited was his employer and withdrew the claim against the second respondent, so the tribunal dismissed the claim against the second respondent under rule 52. The claimant gave evidence in person; no response form had been lodged by either respondent and neither was represented.
The tribunal found that the claimant was employed by the first respondent on a gross monthly salary of £2,833.33, that he had been paid in full up to and including 30 November 2018, and that he attended work or was on annual leave during December 2018. It found that he was entitled to his full December wage but had not been paid for that month. It also found that he was ready, willing and able to work until his resignation took effect on 18 January 2019, and was therefore entitled to salary for that period, calculated as 18 days' pay by reference to an annual salary of £34,000.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, including section 13(3), and section 23, the tribunal held that the December wages and January pay were sums properly payable under the contract of employment and that the failure to pay them amounted to an unlawful deduction from wages. It therefore ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant £2,833.33 for December 2018 and £1,676.71 for January 2019, both gross and subject to deductions required by law.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against Simon Driscoll Consultancy Limited upheld. The tribunal accepted that the claimant was employed by the first respondent on a gross monthly salary of £2,833.33, was not paid for December 2018, and was entitled to 18 days' pay in January 2019 up to the effective resignation date of 18 January 2019. | Upheld | — | £4,510 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against the second respondent was withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed by the tribunal in terms of rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,510
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 13(3) ERA 1996
- section 23 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.