Case 4100313/2017 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100313/2017 Mr B Machray v Represented by: Ms D Casale Clydesdale Bank plc and others — 2017

Case reference: 4100313/2017
Decision date: 29 September 2017
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Murdo

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100313/2017 Mr B Machray

Respondent

Represented by: Ms D Casale Clydesdale Bank plc and others

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr B Machray, had withdrawn the claim. On that basis, Employment Judge Murdo A MacLeod dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The short judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action beyond the case listing reference and the general public-interest-disclosure categorisation on the GOV.UK listing. No liability findings, legal reasoning on the merits, or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type. It states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.