Case 4100315/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Thusa Holdings Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100315/2018
- Decision date
- 11 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mary Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Mary Kearns, sitting in Glasgow, gave the judgment orally with reasons on 6 April 2018. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was not present or represented. The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £5,463.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay one week’s statutory notice pay in the sum of £585. In addition, because the claimant had succeeded in claims of a kind mentioned in Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002 and the respondent had failed to issue a written statement of employment particulars required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal made an award of four weeks’ pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, being £2,340. The total amount ordered was £8,388.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £5,463 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of one week's statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £585 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,388
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- Schedule 5 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.