Case 4100317/2017 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4100317/2017 Mr I McGill v Represented by: Mr R Russell Solicitor Kevin McGee & Mrs Marion McGee — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100317/2017
- Decision date
- 4 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge WA Meiklejohn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4100317/2017 Mr I McGill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr I McGill brought claims against Kevin McGee and Mrs M McGee t/a City Blinds. The judgment records that the wages act claim was withdrawn by the claimant on 4 September 2017.
The tribunal then dismissed all remaining heads of claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted judgment does not record any remedy, and no substantive merits findings are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment does not list each head of claim individually, but the case context identifies a disability discrimination claim; the judgment says all heads of claim apart from the wages act were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment does not list each head of claim individually, but the case context identifies an unfair dismissal claim; the judgment says all heads of claim apart from the wages act were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the wages act claim was withdrawn by the claimant on 4 September 2017. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment does not list each head of claim individually, but the case context identifies a working time claim; the judgment says all heads of claim apart from the wages act were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.