Case 4100319/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Margaret Wood v , Solicitor The Food Train Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100319/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Margaret Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Margaret Wood worked for The Food Train Ltd from 18 April 2016 until her resignation on 26 October 2020, most recently as Service Administrator & Co-ordinator at the Dumfries and Galloway office. After returning from absence in spring 2020, she was dealt with by the respondent over cash-sheet and QuickBooks discrepancies. The tribunal found that the stage 2 written warning issued on 18 June 2020 was outside the respondent's own procedure, was premature, and was later rescinded on appeal.
The tribunal found that the later disciplinary steps also contributed to a breakdown in mutual trust and confidence. It held that the 30 September 2020 invitation to a disciplinary hearing concerned historic matters from March 2020, that the claimant had already investigated and addressed those discrepancies, and that a formal misconduct process with possible dismissal was not justified on the material before the respondent. The re-issued invitation of 20 October 2020 repeated those problems, and the tribunal considered that Ms Carruthers had not undertaken an adequate investigation before escalating matters.
For the period 20 to 23 October 2020, the tribunal found that Ms McAnespie's conduct towards the claimant was the last straw in a cumulative repudiatory course of conduct. It accepted that the claimant resigned promptly on 26 October 2020 in response to that breach. The dismissal was therefore constructive and unfair, and the respondent failed to establish a fair reason or a reasonable procedure under section 98 ERA 1996.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,284.62. It accepted the claimant's claimed losses for the period out of work, later reduced earnings, pension loss, and £500 for loss of employment rights, producing a total award of £16,403.74.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal found under section 94 ERA 1996; the tribunal treated the warning, disciplinary invitations, and October 2020 treatment as a cumulative repudiatory breach. | Upheld | — | £16,404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,404
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,285
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £14,119
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98(1) and (2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- mutual trust and confidence
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Western Excavating Ltd v Sharp
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.