Case 4100322/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v South Lanarkshire Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100322/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claim had been sisted on 12 April 2021 because of outstanding criminal proceedings. The parties were asked to provide an update by 12 July 2021, but no correspondence was received from the claimant.
On 28 July 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 11 August 2021, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out for failure to actively pursue it. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing category identifies Unfair Dismissal, but the judgment itself only refers to 'the claim' being struck out and does not set out the substantive complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The gov.uk listing category identifies Written Statements, but the judgment itself only refers to 'the claim' being struck out and does not set out the substantive complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.