Case 4100328/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Chapman v The Clyde Football Club Community Interest Company — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100328/2018
- Decision date
- 13 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Chapman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim form was sent to the respondent on 26 January 2018 and that the respondent did not enter a response within the time required by the Rules. On that basis, and under Rule 21, Employment Judge Murdo Macleod decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing on the available material.
The judgment states that the claimant's complaints of breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages, and payment in respect of holiday leave accrued but untaken as at the date of termination of employment succeeded. No further reasoning on the underlying merits is given in this short judgment, because the decision was made on the respondent's failure to respond.
The tribunal did not fix any monetary award in this judgment. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a separate hearing listed for 13 April 2018. No split award figures or total sum are recorded in the decision itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to lodge a response; liability only, with remedy deferred. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to lodge a response; liability only, with remedy deferred. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records a successful claim for payment in respect of holiday leave accrued but untaken at the date of termination; remedy was to be fixed at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 16 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.