Case 4100329/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Anderson v Monteiths Bar (Gourock) Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100329/2018
- Decision date
- 23 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided by Employment Judge Murdo Macleod on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that Ms A Anderson was dismissed on the grounds of redundancy. On that basis, the tribunal ordered Monteiths Bar (Gourock) Limited to pay a redundancy payment of £1,526.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,017.50. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £102.25. The judgment records no other findings or remedies.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed on the grounds of redundancy and ordered a redundancy payment of £1,526. | Upheld | — | £1,526 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,017.50. | Upheld | — | £1,018 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; this has been classified as holiday_pay. | Upheld | — | £102 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,646
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.