Case 4100331/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A McIntosh v Monteiths Bar (Gourock) Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100331/2018
- Decision date
- 23 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A McIntosh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal treated the case as a Rule 21 matter after the respondent failed to enter a response within 28 days of service of the claim form sent on 26 January 2018. Employment Judge Macleod decided on the papers that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The claimant's complaints of failure to pay a redundancy payment, notice pay, and holiday pay were all upheld. The judgment records that the redundancy payment was assessed by reference to 17 years' service and the claimant's age of 58 at termination, producing an award of £3,952.50. Notice pay was assessed at 12 weeks' net pay of £155 per week, producing £1,860. Holiday pay was assessed at 6.5 days at £50 per day, producing £325.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded £3,952.50 in respect of redundancy payment, based on 17 years' service and age 58 at termination. | Upheld | — | £3,953 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded £1,860 for notice pay, calculated as 12 weeks' net pay at £155 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,860 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £325 for unpaid holiday pay, calculated as 6.5 days at £50 per day. | Upheld | — | £325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,138
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.