Case 4100333/2020 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4100333/2020 P Mr Matthew Taylor v EGP Employment Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100333/2020
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4100333/2020 P Mr Matthew Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent did not dispute the claim and was not present or represented. The claimant, Mr Matthew Taylor, had lodged a complaint of unlawful deduction of wages against EGP Employment Services Limited.
The tribunal found that the claimant worked 90 hours in November 2019 and had not been paid for that work. On the evidence before it, the claimant was due to be paid at the rate of £8.25 per hour, producing an unpaid sum of £742.50. The tribunal therefore held that the complaint of unlawful deduction of wages succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay £742.50 to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent did not dispute the claim. | Upheld | — | £743 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £743
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.