Case 4100335/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4100335/2020; 4100417/2020 and 4100418/20020 Miss C Wright v My Roots Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100335/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4100335/2020; 4100417/2020 and 4100418/20020 Miss C Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because the respondent presented no response. On the available material, the Employment Judge found that My Roots Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the first claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £990. The Judge also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the second claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,400.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement due to the first claimant and ordered payment of £630. It made the same finding in relation to the second claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £800. The judgment records no additional findings beyond these monetary awards and does not set out any separate remedy breakdown beyond the four sums ordered.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant: unauthorised deduction from wages; ordered to pay £990. | Upheld | — | £990 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant: unauthorised deductions from wages; ordered to pay £1,400. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Holiday pay | First claimant: failure to pay holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £630. | Upheld | — | £630 |
| Holiday pay | Second claimant: failure to pay holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £800. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,820
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.