Case 4100338/2017 · Employment Tribunal
R Gall Mr J Traynor v Chequers — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100338/2017
- Decision date
- 24 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
R Gall Mr J Traynor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. The tribunal found that the claimant, Mr J Traynor, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent, Chequers Ltd, to pay damages of £596.80, described as 1 week's pay.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £477.44 in respect of 4 days' leave accrued but untaken at the time of termination of employment.
In addition, the tribunal ordered reimbursement of the £160 tribunal fee paid by the claimant for lodging the claim. The hearing listed for 12 May 2017 was cancelled. The total monetary sum awarded was £1,234.24.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages equivalent to 1 week's pay. | Upheld | — | £597 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment for 4 days' leave accrued but untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £477 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,234
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.