Case 4100338/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Knap v Whitehill House Golf Club Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100338/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Shepherd Magdalena
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Knap
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing held remotely on 19 January 2022, Employment Judge J Shepherd Magdalena recorded that the respondent was liable to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £456.30. The judgment does not set out further reasoning on that issue in the extracted text, but it records the award as an order of the tribunal.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,276.80 gross, subject to deduction and remittance of income tax and national insurance if appropriate. The extracted judgment is limited to the dispositive orders and does not contain additional findings or a separate breakdown of remedy beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal ordered payment of a statutory redundancy payment in the sum of £456.30. | Upheld | — | £456 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered payment of £1,276.80 gross, with income tax and national insurance to be deducted and remitted to HMRC if appropriate. | Upheld | — | £1,277 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,733
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.