Case 4100360/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100360/2021 Mr P Splawski v Paradise Cuisine Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100360/2021
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100360/2021 Mr P Splawski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment on liability in favour of Mr P Splawski against Paradise Cuisine Ltd. It held that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay holiday pay, failure to pay redundancy pay, and arrears of pay succeeded.
The judgment does not set out findings on the underlying facts or legal reasoning beyond recording those successful complaints. It also states that remedy would be determined at a later hearing to be conducted by telephone, so no award is fixed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to pay holiday pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to pay redundancy pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint for arrears of pay succeeded; this is classified as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.