Case 4100364/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4100364/2021 Hearing Held by CVP on and November 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Members: C Jackson & P Fallow Mr S Ward v Represented by: Self ` ASY Garden Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100364/2021
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
- Panel members
- C Jackson, P Fallow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4100364/2021 Hearing Held by CVP on and November 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Members: C Jackson & P Fallow Mr S Ward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 1 and 2 November 2021, before Employment Judge Alan Strain sitting with members C Jackson and P Fallow, Mr S Ward brought a claim against ASY Garden Services Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claim was for automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment states that the claim was unsuccessful and was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out the tribunal’s detailed factual findings or reasoning, but it records that oral reasons were given to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim pleaded as automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.