Case 4100368/2024 · Employment Tribunal
J D Young Mr M Simpson v The Harbour Galley Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4100368/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J D Young Mr M Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a single claim that he had not been paid the full amount of wages due by Harbour Galley Limited. The respondent did not present a response and did not appear at the hearing. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and considered his schedule of hours worked and the calculation of sums due in document C1.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed between 21 July 2023 and 11 November 2023. It accepted that he was initially employed as a Chef on £25,000 per annum, then promoted to Sous Chef on £27,000 per annum and later to Head Chef on £37,000 per annum. On the evidence, the tribunal found that wages accrued for the period 21 July 2023 to 31 July 2023, described as 'lying time', were payable at termination and amounted to £1,062.75. It also found unpaid overtime of £1,188 for August 2023, £704 for September 2023 and £704 for October 2023, with no TOIL taken before employment ended.
The claimant was told on 11 November 2023 that the respondent could not continue to trade and that his employment was terminated. He said he was told the overtime and 'lying time' would be paid later, but the tribunal did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that wages to the end of November 2023 were due. It held that the total unpaid sum of £3,412.75 was an unauthorised deduction from wages within s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of that gross sum, under deduction of tax and national insurance contributions as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant was owed unpaid wages made up of 'lying time' and overtime hours, and that no TOIL had been taken before termination. The award was the gross sum of £3,412.75, subject to tax and national insurance deductions as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £3,413 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,413
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.