Case 4100373/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100373/2024 Held at Aberdeen on June 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A Huzarski v Represented by, Mr C Howie, Solicitor Assisted by Ms A M Kaczmarczyk, Interpreter Dandara UK Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4100373/2024
- Decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100373/2024 Held at Aberdeen on June 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A Huzarski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 June 2024, the tribunal dealt with Mr A Huzarski's claims against Dandara UK Services Limited for unfair dismissal and redundancy payment. The judgment records that the claimant had less than two years' continuous service.
On that basis, the tribunal determined that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain either the unfair dismissal claim or the redundancy payment claim, and both claims were dismissed. The written judgment was dated 28 August 2024 and entered in the register on 29 August 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had less than two years' continuous service, so it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant had less than two years' continuous service, so it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the redundancy payment claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.