Case 4100374/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T McCafferty v Mitie Property Services (UK) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100374/2018
- Decision date
- 14 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T McCafferty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in Scotland issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response to the claim form sent on 23 January 2018. On the material available, Employment Judge Murdo Macleod decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of discrimination on the grounds of race succeeded. The judgment does not set out further factual findings on liability, and it records that the respondent did not lodge a response within the required 28-day period.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be decided at a later hearing before an Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response; remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 16 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.