Case 4100384/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100384/2022 Ms S Maxwell v Glasgow City Council City Chambers Cordia Services LLP Culture and Sport Glasgow — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100384/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100384/2022 Ms S Maxwell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Ms Maxwell's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that on 7 November 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 21 November 2022 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Laura Doherty decided that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.