Case 4100385/2021 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100385/2021 Mr M Slomianowski v Beyond Compare Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100385/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100385/2021 Mr M Slomianowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Muriel Robison determined the case on the available material and issued judgment on 8 March 2021, entered in the register on 9 March 2021.
The tribunal found that Beyond Compare Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Slomianowski’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,177. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £216.
No other remedies were recorded in the judgment. The total sum awarded on the face of the judgment was £1,393.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the respondent. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,177. | Upheld | — | £1,177 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the respondent. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £216. | Upheld | — | £216 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,393
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.