Case 4100386/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100386/2018 Held at Glasgow on May 2018 Employment Judge: M s M Robison Miss C Holland v Not present and represented Lion & Star — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100386/2018
- Decision date
- 16 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100386/2018 Held at Glasgow on May 2018 Employment Judge: M s M Robison Miss C Holland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningA hearing was listed for 8 May 2018, but the claimant did not attend. The clerk contacted her, and she explained that she had emailed the Tribunal on the previous day to say she could not attend because her daughter was not in nursery and that she was not aware of the hearing time. The reasons record that she had sent several emails on 7 and 8 May seeking confirmation of the hearing time and explaining that her daughter could not attend nursery because she had scarlet fever.
In those circumstances, the Employment Judge adjourned the hearing and directed that the case be re-listed for a fresh hearing. The claimant was to be notified of the new date and time and was required to attend. The tribunal stated that failure to attend without reasonable excuse may result in the claim being dismissed. No findings were made on the substantive claims and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | No merits decision was made. The tribunal adjourned the hearing and directed that the case be re-listed for a fresh hearing because the claimant did not attend. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No merits decision was made. The tribunal adjourned the hearing and directed that the case be re-listed for a fresh hearing because the claimant did not attend. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | No merits decision was made. The tribunal adjourned the hearing and directed that the case be re-listed for a fresh hearing because the claimant did not attend. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.