Case 4100386/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Member R Martin Tribunal Member E Coyle Mr B Hunter v Represented by: Self Golf Inn @ Ladybank Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100386/2020
- Decision date
- 30 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Dempsey
- Panel members
- R Martin, E Coyle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member R Martin Tribunal Member E Coyle Mr B Hunter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge O’Dempsey sitting with Tribunal Members R Martin and E Coyle at Dundee by CVP on 5, 6, 7 and 8 October 2020. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mr B Hunter, appeared in person and that the respondent was represented by its director, Ms A Arthur. The tribunal also noted that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
During the hearing, the claimant withdrew his holiday pay claim and a separate claim described in the judgment as a breach of the Equality Act 2010. Those claims were dismissed under Rules 51 and 52. The tribunal also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant lacked the continuous employment qualification period required for the tribunal to have jurisdiction to hear it.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deductions from wages and ordered Golf Inn @ Ladybank Ltd to pay £450. It also upheld the claim for failure to provide section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 terms and conditions and ordered payment of £504. A further claim for failure to provide itemized pay statements succeeded, but the tribunal declined to award any monetary sum on that head. The claimant’s application for expenses was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed under Rules 51 and 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim described in the judgment as a breach of the Equality Act 2010 was withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed under Rules 51 and 52. The extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic or underlying Equality Act provision. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant lacked the continuous employment qualification period needed for the tribunal to have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded; the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £450.00. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 terms and conditions succeeded; the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £504. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide itemized pay statements succeeded, but the tribunal declined to make a monetary award. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £954
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.