Case 4100390/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100390/2020 Mr D Sharp v Kevin Joubert — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100390/2020
- Decision date
- 24 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100390/2020 Mr D Sharp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr D Sharp's claim against Kevin Joubert under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
On 31 July 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 14 August 2020, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the merits of any underlying employment complaint and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s); it states only that 'the claim' is struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.