Case 4100396/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Ms W Rosenau v Paulo Bar Ltd trading as ‘Café Victoria by Paulo’ — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100396/2026
- Decision date
- 29 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms W Rosenau
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented by Paulo Bar Ltd trading as ‘Café Victoria by Paulo’. Employment Judge A Kemp issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms W Rosenau's wages by failing to pay all normal wages and overtime due. It awarded £1,040.22 gross, comprising £646 in unpaid monthly wages and £394.22 for 30.75 hours of overtime at £12.82 per hour. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £562.98 gross, calculated from entitlement worth £685.08 less £122.10 already paid.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded £671.54 gross in damages for two weeks' contractual notice, calculated from £1,153.80 less £482.30 already paid. The three awards total £2,274.74 gross. The respondent may deduct Income Tax and employee National Insurance Contributions where required by law, provided that it remits them to HMRC and gives the claimant written evidence.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for unpaid wages and overtime. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
| Holiday pay | Gross award for unpaid holiday entitlement, which the judgment also described as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £563 |
| Breach of contract | Gross damages for dismissal without the two weeks' notice required by the contract of employment. | Upheld | — | £672 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,275
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.