Case 4100397/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100397/2017 Ms R Dean v HBOS plc — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100397/2017
- Decision date
- 6 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100397/2017 Ms R Dean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms R Dean brought a complaint against HBOS PLC of discrimination or victimisation on the grounds of race or ethnic origin.
The claimant withdrew that complaint. The tribunal therefore dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded or considered in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of discrimination on grounds of race or ethnic origin had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the complaint of victimisation on grounds of race or ethnic origin had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.