Case 4100410/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Laverie st v Lloyd Fraser Primary Logistics Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100410/2024
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Laverie st
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in the absence of a response. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was in administration, but the administrator consented to the proceedings continuing by letter dated 1 February 2024. It also found that the remaining claimants had standing to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives, and the claimants were employees dismissed as redundant. Their employment terminated on 22 September 2023, ACAS early conciliation was started on 20 December 2023, and the ET1 was received on 21 January 2024.
The tribunal found the complaint under section 188 or section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to be well founded. It found that the respondent dismissed more than 20 employees as redundant at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less beginning on 22 September 2023, but failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188. The tribunal therefore made a protective award in respect of employees dismissed as redundant at the Dumfries Enterprise Park establishment and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period, which began on 22 September 2023 and lasted 90 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and made a protective award, but the extracted text does not state a monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.188A TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.