Case 4100413/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Alix v Mami Jo’s Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100413/2018
- Decision date
- 22 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Alix
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Alix succeeded in his claim that Mami Jo's Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from his wages. The Employment Tribunal, sitting in Glasgow before Employment Judge Frances Eccles on 11 May 2018, found that the deductions were unauthorised and ordered the respondent to pay £1,476, being the amount deducted.
The tribunal also found that the claimant sustained financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deductions and awarded a further £219.12 as compensation. The judgment records no other claims, no separate liability findings, and no panel members sitting with the judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,476, plus £219.12 as compensation for financial loss attributable to those deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,695 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,695
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £219
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.